Finite-Volume Time-Domain (FVTD) — Ridged Horn

Home FVTD

Group

Publications

IFH

 
FVTD — Ridged Horn

Geometry
Near Field (movie)
Radiation Pattern
3D Pattern (movie)
Gain

 

 

Broadband Double-Ridged Horn Antenna

Horns are widely used antennas since they have a simple construction, are easy to excite and have a large gain. They are employed for example as feed elements in satellite tracking systems or communication dishes and they serve as a standard antenna for calibration and gain measurements. Since they have a limited bandwidth, great efforts have been made to enlarge the operational bandwidth. Ridges on the side flares are introduced to extend the bandwidth, similar to the ridges in a waveguide that lower the cut-off frequency. The design of double-ridged horn antennas reaches back to the late 1950s. Figures 1 and 2 show a 3D view of the horn that we simulated.

Fig. 1: Tilted front 3D view of the antenna model. 1: Feed section, 2: Ridge, 3: Wedge, 4: Lower flare, 5: Upper flare, 6: Copper strap.
Fig. 2: Feeding section of the double-ridged horn antenna. 1: Ridge, 2: Cavity, 3: Coaxial feed, 4: Source plane, 5: Port plane. Wedges and other parts are removed for better visualization.

 

The model is appropriate for the whole operational frequency band from 1 GHz to 18 GHz, and it consists of 4 831 165 tetrahedrons. The maximum volume ratio of large cells to small cells is 125.

 

The propagation of the electric field is shown at two different frequencies (ramped sinusoidal excitation) in the following movies.

Fig. 3: Magnitude of the electric near-field at 7 GHz.
Fig. 4: Magnitude of the electric near-field at 12 GHz.

 

Figures 5 to 8 show a comparison between measured and simulated far-field patterns at selected frequencies. On the LHS the E-plane patterns are shown and on the RHS the H-plane patterns.

Fig. 5: E-plane (LHS) and H-plane (RHS) radiation pattern. Comparison between simulation and measurement at 2 GHz.
Fig. 6: E-plane (LHS) and H-plane (RHS) radiation pattern. Comparison between simulation and measurement at 4 GHz.
Fig. 7: E-plane (LHS) and H-plane (RHS) radiation pattern. Comparison between simulation and measurement at 8 GHz.

Fig. 8: E-plane (LHS) and H-plane (RHS) radiation pattern. Comparison between simulation and measurement at 12 GHz

 

A three dimensional depiction of the logarithmic-scaled far-field pattern is shown between 1 and 18 GHz in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9: 3D radiation pattern (logarithmic scale).

 

Figure 10 depicts the simulated maximum gain of the horn antenna. Also displayed is the measured and simulated broadside gain. The reflection coefficient S11 is taken into account in the computation of the antenna gain. A deformation of the radiation pattern is apparent in the frequency range of 10 GHz ≤ ≤ 14 GHz and ≥ 16 GHz, where the broadside gain is much lower than the maximum gain. The 3D radiation patterns in linear scale at five characteristic frequencies are displayed beside.

Fig. 10: Simulated and measured antenna gain. The 3D radiation patterns are plotted in linear scale.

 

For further information refer to journal paper [2]. Please address questions and comments to the group members or write an email.

 

 

©2004 dB@IFH • ETH Zürich
last update 2005-12-19

Home FVTD

Group

Publications

IFH